Revelation 3:12
Jesus says, “I will write upon him my new name.” The verse does not identify that name as Ahnsahnghong.
Plain Bible responses
1. Revelation is not a blank check for private interpretation
Revelation 2:17 and 3:12 use symbolic language about victory, belonging, and divine honor. WMSCOG takes a symbolic phrase and fills in a name that the text never gives. That is adding doctrine between the lines.
2. The apostles preached Jesus, not a future replacement name
After the resurrection, the apostles did not tell believers to wait for a later man with a different saving name. They preached Jesus Christ openly: His death, His resurrection, His lordship, and His return.
3. The Holy Spirit glorifies Jesus
John 16:14 says the Spirit “shall glorify me.” The Spirit does not replace Jesus with a new human name. The Spirit points to Christ.
4. The Second Coming is visible and unmistakable
Matthew 24:27 compares the coming of the Son of Man to lightning seen from east to west. Revelation 1:7 says every eye will see Him. That does not match a hidden identity that only one organization can decode.
5. Jesus warned this would happen
Matthew 24:5 is direct: many will come in His name, saying, “I am Christ,” and will deceive many. Any movement that says a later person is Christ must be tested by that warning.
Simple test
Ask one direct question: Where does the Bible explicitly say that Ahnsahnghong is Jesus Christ? If the answer requires a chain of assumptions, symbolic leaps, and organization-only interpretation, the doctrine is not plain Scripture.